Quite near to where I live is the rather attractive tourist town of Much Wenlock, which, because of its history, is entwined closely with The Olympics; some of my web log readers may be aware that next year the Olympic Games are to be held in London and The London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games ( LOCOG) has designed a toy mascot and called it "Wenlock".
It has today come to my attention that Much Wenlock Town Council, successors to the ancient Borough of Wenlock, in Shropshire has copyrighted it's seal and intends to licence its use to local organisations who wish to use it.
It seems that the Town Council felt it necessary to ask the LOCOG for permission to copyright the seal because it contained the word "Wenlock"! Surely the LOCOG is the one who should have asked the Town Council for permission? I certainly wouldn't have asked them for permission to include a word which has been used on the Town Seal since the fifteenth century and is part of the actual name of the town ... in fact, I think it should be quite the reverse.
The Town Clerk has also stated that "Use of the Seal is free to not for profit organisations. When the draft charging policy went to Council for approval councillors could not agree on the charges. Some said it should be more and some said we shouldn't let anyone use the seal."
I am firmly in the shouldn't let anyone use the seal camp. I find it quite bizarre that a corporate body should be allowing anyone to use its seal. A seal (which can feature a coat of arms but is not to be confused with a coat of arms) is the legal signature of the corporation and is used as means of authentication. It is a mark or symbol which is attached to a legal document. If I were a resident of Much Wenlock, I would be protesting in the strongest of terms that it is not at all proper for the Town Council to license the use of its seal to anyone. This is an ancient seal - I think that the original users of it would know full well what the purpose of a seal is.
I have suggested most strongly to the Much Wenlock Town Clerk that it is not proper to take this course of action.
I saw this post today on one of Facebook's many heraldry forums but before I had a chance to respond the original poster had disabled c...
Readers of this weblog will be well aware that I have grave concerns over the lack of any lawful authority behind the acts of the so called...
The armorial bearings newly devised and used by the "Office of the Chief Herald of Malta". You may be aware that earlier in...
It has come to my attention, perhaps rather late in the day (closing date for responses was 29th June 2020), that Kenya is striving to re...