Bookplates from a friend

 At the end of October I was delighted to receive a letter from a friend in heraldry, Stephen Slater, who kindly enclosed a number of bookplates he thought might interest me and for which I am most grateful.

I share then here for all to see but first of all, I though that you might be interested in the lovely seal featured on Steve's note paper:

Granted by The College of Arms 2 March 1985, Steve's arms are, Or three pairs of wings each conjoined in lure and upwards Sable between six cross crosslets Vert. Crest: On a circlet Sable edged and ermined Or between two sickles blades uppermost points inward Argent the handles Gules the outer edges of the blades set with peacocks feathers proper a demi talbot Azure langued Gules. Motto: Dona Nobis Pacem (Give Us Peace).

I've always liked these arms and here is a coloured version:

Bookplates: 

Of particular Cheshire interest is the bookplate of Thomas Charlton Clutton, Esq. of Chorlton Hall. (A0570 4 F5172).

Sir Edward Hales Bart. (F13257)

And a couple of coloured ones:

1st, James Frederick Beever.

And finally John Beatson.

A lovely surprise, thank you Steve.

 

Squirrels and Chevrons

 Squirrels and Chevrons - a heraldry talk.

I originally gave this talk to the Oxford Heraldry Society during lockdown and it seemed to go down well so I've decided to make it publicly available for all to see. 

The original intention of this lecture was to have been a study of the arms used by the descendants of Lidulph de Twemlow illustrating their use of squirrels and chevrons. However, it soon became apparent that our journey could not ignore the wider descent of Lidulph’s own ancestors. Our study therefore is a meandering one and begins with Wulfric, Lord of Croxton and Lache.

Elizabeth the Great

I was born a few short months after the Coronation of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. This great lady had been a part of my life forever and it seemed as though she would always be a part of my life. Her legacy will live on in our hearts forever. 

Image courtesy of the 

BBC/CHRIS LEVINE/ JERSEY HERITAGE TRUST

God bless and keep Her Majesty.

God Save The King

Threat (intimidation) Naaaaa.

 In a follow up to my earlier posts I find with some amusement that I have gained fame as a "Fake Hunter" and there appears to be a website out there in world wide web intent on "Debunking the Fake Hunters". The anonymous (cowardly) owner of this website appears to be under the misapprehension that I (and others so proudly featured in his blog) might be intimidated, or bullied. He is of course quite wrong. 

This website (I'm sure you can find it if you search, I'm not going to link to it) is full of hate speech and scandalous misinformation set down in a rather pathetic way. It is a greenhouse of defamation. 

During last month I was contacted by a friend who asked if I would like to respond to the scurrilous accusations made on this hotbed of defamation; after giving it some thought, I decided to. Unlike the  cowardly owner of the site who hides behind a weak idea of anonymity, my life is something of an open book and I am happy to put the record straight (not that anyone in their right mind would believe anything posted on the "Debunking" site).

Here is a transcript of an interview I did a few days ago: https://bit.ly/3CSpPfn

 

Aristo Prats

 Well, our friend The Chief Herald of Arms of Malta is in the news once again with reports of his strange acceptance of dubious titles being in Private Eye  being repeated in the Blog of Loving Malta dot com.

Quote "Whether it’s passports or public assets, Malta’s government has a knack for controversial sales. But now, it’s the decision to sell dubious titles and arms to noble pretenders that has raised eyebrows in the UK. 

Private Eye, the iconic British publication, looked into Malta’s new sideline hustle, “title-laundering”, which sees the country grant heraldic titles and arms transforming “imaginary princes to ones recognised by an EU member state”."

If you click on the image you can see the full sized article.

Threats? Naaa.

 My reader, who has no doubt been closely following the Malta saga, will be pleased to learn that things are moving on apace. Prior to being able to place a formal accusation of Misconduct in Public Office against the Chief Herald of Arms of Malta before the Government Ombudsman, I had to go through several prior steps, the most important being to lay my complaint before his employer, Heritage Malta, to give them a chance to investigate. This I did however, Heritage Malta chose to take the same route they did when I first put it to them that the Office of Chief Herald had not been properly founded; they immediately went on the attack and defended their employee. History now shows that the advice they received from their advocate in that initial matter, advice that led them to set down their reasons for the legitimacy of the office, provided me with ample opportunity to forensically pull it apart and, ultimately, led to the Ombudsman finding against that advice and the eventual correct legislation being put in place.

I wrote to the Chief Executive of Heritage Malta putting a simplified case to him on the first of August and yesterday, 11th August, received a reply from Heritage Malta’s legal advisers. I briefly responded. It now appears that the Chief Herald has decided that he can print that letter in full on his website so I shall, with the greatest of pleasure, share with you my brief reply. Now that I have received the formal “Reply as to the legal legitimacy of the Chief Herald of Arms of Malta”. I now have the “official” defence and now have a document to forensically examine to provide further evidence to the Government Ombudsman. I shall be doing so shortly however, as I will be attending the Cambridge conference next week, please don’t expect my response to be prompt.

Here is the link to the “Reply as to the legal legitimacy of the Chief Herald of Arms of Malta”:

https://bit.ly/3QdtgkN

And here is the link to my brief response: https://bit.ly/3pbDQgr

I am particularly looking forward to forming an opinion on the lawyer’s comment that in regard to Coronets, supporters etc “the Government recognises only the totality of the Arms as belonging to an individual not any particular significance given by third parties to any specific components therein. As far as the government is concerned, one can display anything one likes in one’s coat of Arms …”

So, no significance in the coronet of a marquis and no significance in the coronet of a baron and yet, I have, just yesterday, declined an application from a Scottish baron who (did not have Scots arms) chose to receive a grant from Malta and was awarded, by the Chief Herald of Arms, supporters and the coronet of a baron. Apparently, there is no significance in this!

I shall be away at the Cambridge Conference next week but rest assured, I am really looking forward to drafting my complaint to the Ombudsman.

The Barons Brereton

 I have been informed by a friend of the Cheshire Heraldry website, Michael Furlong, that a French auction site is offering for sale a painting which appears to be the arms of the Barons Brereton.

Described as a "Coat Of Arms Painted On Parchment, Italy 17th Century". Coat of arms painted on parchment Italy 17th century. Gilt wood frame.

Coat Of Arms Painted On Parchment, Italy 17th Century. Price: 1500 €

Period: 17th century. Style: Louis 14th, Regency. Condition: Excellent condition. 

Material: Parchment: Width: 36 cm Height: 44.5 cm

Reference: 673578

A.J Antiquités

The 2nd and 3rd quarters appear to be "Or, three piles conjoined in base Gules"

I'm not sure where the Italian reference came from but many thanks to Michael for alerting me to it.