The Beaumont Earls of Chester

Recent study of William Flower’s The Visitation of Yorkshire (1563–1564) has certainly thrown up some unexpected curiosities. 

The appearance of an entry linking "Beaumont" as the "Earls of Chester" on Page 18 of William Flower’s The Visitation of Yorkshire (1563–1564) was certainly a surprise. The error, and I do believe that it is an error, is not mentioned in the foreword. I believe that it is due to a highly specific, late-medieval genealogical error regarding the maternal ancestry of the Barons Dacre of the North.

Page 18 of this specific visitation outlines the pedigree for "Dacre of the North." Within that lineage, the early Tudor heralds appear to have mistakenly recorded an early ancestor as marrying a daughter of the "Beaumont Earls of Chester." It seems to me that the Heralds conflated two separate entities.

The entry appears to be a historical error born from the conflation of two powerful Anglo-Norman magnates who lived during the 12th century:

The Real Earls of Chester: The early Earls of Chester were from the d'Avranches and Meschin families (such as Ranulf de Meschin and Ranulf de Blondeville). They were never Beaumonts.

The Beaumont Earls: The House of Beaumont famously held the Earldom of Leicester (alongside the Earldom of Warwick).

Because both the Earls of Chester and the Beaumont Earls of Leicester were top-tier Anglo-Norman barons who frequently intermarried, fought, and held vast, overlapping estates across the Midlands and the North of England, later Tudor heralds drafting the Dacre lineage seem to have confused the two titles into a single blended identity.

When William Flower conducted his tour of Yorkshire in 1563, he relied heavily on family rolls, oral traditions, and older, unverified manuscripts supplied by the families themselves to construct deep medieval roots. Many families sought to anchor their lineage to prestigious Conquest-era or Magna Carta-era barons.

Over centuries, accurate names often blurred: a real marriage to a daughter of a Beaumont (Earl of Leicester) or a Meschin (Earl of Chester) was misremembered or mistranscribed as a "Beaumont Earl of Chester." Rather than correcting the error, the heralds appear to have recorded it as presented, cementing a fictional title into the official pages of Yorkshire's genealogical history. Incredible!

At the end of the pedigree there is an heraldic note which provides a quarterly blazon:

Beaumont, Azure, a lion rampant Or. 

Bearing in mind that my present avenue of research is to find canting arms, Beaumont means Beautiful mountain - what a missed opportunity!

Yorkshire Heraldry - Mitford

I have spent some time today researching the Visitations of Yorkshire (1563 and 1564) looking for possible examples of punning arms. Just occasionally I stumble across a coat of arms which, although not a punning coat, is a coat that "alludes" to something relating to the surname. 

Yes, I do realise that there are lots of coats of arms, especially those newly created, which have charges specifically chosen to represent aspects of the armiger's life, or family, but these coats are slightly different. I hope that the Mitford allusion will become almost self evident once explained.

The arms of Mitford (Yorkshire Visitations 1563/4)

Argent, on a fess between three moles passant Sable a mullet Or.

The choice of moles in the arms of the Mitford family is widely considered a canting (punning) coat, though it operates as an allusion to land ownership rather than a direct pun on the surname itself.

The historical coat of arms for the ancient Northumbrian family of Mitford (and their descendants, such as the Barons Redesdale and the famous Mitford sisters) is actually blazoned as: Argent, a fess between three moles Sable. The blazon recorded in the Yorkshire Visitation of 1563 and 1564 (Argent, on a fess between three moles passant Sable a mullet Or) represents a specific, cadenced branch of the family. The addition of the gold star (a mullet Or) placed on top of the central horizontal bar (on a fess) is a traditional mark of cadency used to denote a third son.

While many cants mimic the sound of the family name (like Shelley bearing whelk shells), the Mitford moles are a topographical cant representing their land ownership. In May 1369, Sir John de Mitford was granted the lands and tenements of the ville of Molesden (a township located in the ancient parish of Mitford, Northumberland). Shortly after acquiring Molesden, the family adopted three moles (traditionally referred to in old northern English as moldiwarps) into their arms to explicitly play on the name of their new estate.

Because the use of moles as a primary charge is exceptionally rare in British heraldry, this remains one of the most famous examples of an estate-based cant in English armory.

Powys Arms Wetley Rocks

Many moons ago, I wrote to the then licencee of The Powys Arms, Wetley Rocks, pointing out that the coat of arms on their pub sign was not the arms of the Powys, Lords of the Manor of Wetley Rocks, but, most incorrectly, the coat of arms of Powys County Council! My efforts to persuade them to correct the mistake did resulted in the removel of the old, faded, incorrect pub sign but, sadly, it was replaced with a sign that was not the arms of Powys but was simply a sign with the words The Powys Arms written upon it. Perhaps this was cheaper, or easier, than painting the actual, correct arms. 

The former, now replaced Inn sign at the Powys Arms, Wetley Rocks showing the coat of arms of Powys County Council (Wales). Which has absolutely nothing  to do with the arms of Powys of Westwood, Lords of the Manor of Wetley Rocks.

It saddens me that an incresing number of pubs with "Arms" names are forgetting that their name origins stem, litterally, from coats of Arms with local histories, and are replacing their signs with just words. The Powys Arms are a prime example. 

Today, a repost appeared on the Facebook page of the Staffordshire Sentinel/Leek Post and Times reposrting that, after a facelift, the pub has re-opend under the management of Julie, a new publican. Whilst I realise that the loss of true armorial pub signs is likely a result of tightening budgets, I can't help but wonder if Julie might be open to a suggestion that reinstating the proper Powys Arms on the pub sign might restore some link to the pubs past.

Tony Consadine - a sad farewell

 Tony Consadine, from Lancaster, passed away last Wednesday the 23rd September 2026. 

Many from the Heraldry world will remember Tony, he was Heraldist to the Lancashire Family History and Heraldry Society, a long time member of the Cheshire Heraldry Society, member of Yorkshire Heraldry Society, Member of The Heraldry Society, and a good friend in heraldry. 

He contributed many an article to the publications of the Yorkshire Heraldry Society and was always ready to lend a hand during the meetings of the Cheshire Heraldry Society.

Tony had been poorly for quite some time and after a valiant struggle, passed away last Wednesday the 23rd September 2026. He was a loving father of a son and two daughters, and a much loved brother to George, as well as a much loved granddad.

May he rest in peace.